The Click
When you are in the middle of a conversation and hear a few disjointed words and suddenly understand the joke or the hidden meaning, something clicks. An information pops into existence. In a different manner, when you get inside of a room and feel the tension right away. Not because of any person specifically but the whole atmosphere created. A insight flows into us.
Something clicks, this is what gestalt means. It is a emerging experience through our consciousness but before we get deeper, there are few things I must explain. There is two people whose ideas are redefining the logic we know.
First, Kurt Gödel, the genius mathematician whom created the incompleteness theorem as a qualitative leap in math, philosophy and logic. His idea was simple as this, "This sentence is unprovable.", in such a rational, linear and logical system. Yet, that was not enough, he took another step which gave quants a existential nightmare fuel. His statement was,
"A system cannot prove it's own consistency."
How does this stand against a field like math? Such rational and definitive system, right? His first statement is simple enough to understand. If that sentence is provable, then it is false because it argues that it is unprovable. If we try to prove that the statement is provable and true, thesis collapses, if it is true that it is unprovable we already cross the line by saying it is unprovable. So if the sentence's statement is false and it is provable, then again, proof of the sentence is false because of the paradoxical loop. The loop is, if the sentence is false then it is provable. If it is provable then the statement is false, which sends us back to the proof because now the statement is false and makes this unprovable. Only if we say that this sentence is true, yet unprovable;
It changes everything. If the sentence is unprovable which as its statement argues, then it is true and this makes the unprovability also true, agreeing with all logical terms.
Then there is G.W.F. Hegel, the great philosopher, he argues that to define a being real, there has to be thesis and antithesis which mixes into a higher as synthesis. Without delving Hegel's mind, we can give simple examples to understand it better. The examples can be, the existence of free will. If there is good and bad, there must be a decision-making. If there is experience and experiencer then there is reality. If there is existent and nothingness there is being.
Here we just ran over the Gödel's incompleteness and Hegelian dialectic. Now what will we do with those? Stick with me, we will create a cognitive tesseract.
Just as a symphony emerges not from any single note but from the relationship between tones in time, the human consciousness arises not only from isolated neurons but from their recursive, symbolic interplay that suggests meaning is an emergent illusion that still commands real causality. Even further, an osmosis can emerge with it's own fractal lexicon. Which cannot be proven or understood but absorbed, saturated. The rational knowledge forms the base, paradoxes and contradictions apply pressure to it which the insights pop with the absorption.
Then there's the higher understanding comes. The system itself resonates differently. Whenever this loop reoccurs, we get to a more complex field of mind and gain ability to create ideas deeper, more impactful and more complex about what saturates. Our semi-permeable membrane that selectively absorbs complexity from its environment and exposure, not only facts and data but patterns, aesthetics, contradictions and truths that are rather unconscious then a conscious learning. The rational knowledge and unprovable truth mixes into the absorbed insight. Which shows that,
We do not learn, we do not prove, we become saturated with irreconcilable truths until they coalesce into something new but not a solution, rather a higher being. Which in the mind of us takes a bigger space and resonates with the ideas that emerge as needs or cravings, redefining truths and beliefs. Our mind, our soul, whatever you would like to call, dwells in ambiguity, waiting. Then Gödelian leakage comes in play, where the logic falls, the system collapses inward and truth locates itself outside of the system. Here we are reshaping the unknown to force coherence out of chaos, to will meaning to existence and not waiting its revelation.
It is the time for the leap, the irrational choice to step beyond the system, not a calculation a transformation to become what the current self cannot justify or see a possibility of.
People shall not seek only the truth, they should absorb the unspeakable, confront the unprovable and leap beyond the known. Not to find certainty but to become the force that sees through irrelevance. Because we are thrown into existence not by choice but as a fact, we already find ourselves in a world with almost no instruction manual. We awaken in a maze, not knowing who built it or why we are inside, we are embedded in a contingent being caught in motion. This geworfenheit(throwness) is the starting condition for being with a will. We are not at the perfect form but in the perfect destiny. We are the fragmentation of puzzle when we are thrown. Yet we are allowed to transcendence,
Into a puzzle itself. With wohnen(dwelling) we do not just reside, we inhabit meaningfully. Attuning to the world, to the rhythms of being uncontrollablely, rather than controlling it. So our minds does not seizes but let's it happen. Absorbs the unspeakable unconsciously with exposure, instead of dissecting it.
Emerged in a system we did not design, we are aware inside of a universe that is unprovable and fragmented. Inhabiting a existence rather than solving, dwelling in atmospheres and contradictions. The meaning that is given to us begins to saturate us. There we realize the system is incomplete, fed from beyond the limits of our eyes and ears. Through perception of what the eye can't see and ear can't hear. Open to all exposure, incomplete structure.
Yet it does not collapse, rather it ignites the will. Refuses passivity, starts assert meanings. Faced with this, we leap, a transformation not a conclusion. In the effect of whatever we are exposed to. Each folded layer spirals into a higher and higher being. Until our mind achieve it's limits. Once again stepping beyond its limits and creating recursive structure of insight, contradiction, will and faith.
We do not arrive, we leap. We do not evolve, we transfigure, metamorphose and alterate ourselves.
Thus, that is not just a theory, it is a weapon.
It is how thought evolves without logic, how revolutions are dreamt before planned,
how geniuses are grown rather than trained.
In the end, it is how someone can infect a reality within the unreachable depths of someone else's mind. Then there is the new beginning, a emerging reality affecting all our actions.
A cognitive tesseract or hazard for your mind; crafting a will to power.
Yorumlar